A Chance to Change?

IMG_0062The last few days have been agog with news about the CBI Director’s Visitors’ Diary. I felt sad for CBI-another good institution which was facing public anger and distrust. It was an organization I was associated with for four years and which showed me through the general organizational culture and the cases I investigated there, what was truly meant by ‘public servant should be seen to be upholding the highest standards of integrity’.

In public life, nothing really can be truly hidden from exposure. But employees, both from public as well as private sectors, continue to work with such impressions. Is this delusion because of our systems, which never encouraged openness? RTI Act is slowly changing things, especially the ‘power means I can’t be questioned’ mindset. But can the government do more to bring accountability to officials exercising great power.

I think this problem can be approached from two sides:  1. Improve effectiveness of internal whistleblowing, and 2. Put in external monitors.

A friend who has been a keen observer of government and bureaucracy mentioned to me one simple and effective way forward on point 2.above- a system of periodic review of the functioning of strategic organizations through open-to-public(this is critical for effectiveness, but currently the process is closed-door, for whichever organizations it takes place)hearings at Parliamentary committees, similar to the senate committee hearings in USA.

The real challenge is, however, on point 1. i.e to create a truly independent watch structure which can give the required focus to whistleblowing. The vigilance departments in all government depts are far from independent and instead are part of the organization itself reporting to its management. And it is unreal to expect this system to act against the boss if there are complaints. Current vigilance mechanisms have this flaw.

Finally, since the competence and integrity of people holding powerful positions really matter to their organization’s performance, a system like the one USA has of open-to-public senate confirmations, needs to be explored. Maybe, this may also reduce our present concerns and distrust on the post-retirement appointments of persons holding powerful positions during their regular government service, since their initial appointment and confirmation to powerful posts would have been an open process.





4 thoughts on “A Chance to Change?

  1. Its true madam. Current CVC structure in organizations were not independent and is like Independent Directors in companies who are at the mercy of Management itself.

    Openness is the solution for this problem and hope we would change for better working conditions in organizations.


  2. I remember that when on my first promotion as SP crime branch CID in Lucknow in 1981, the organisatonal ethos passed on was never to allow a visitor concerning cases in your home and in officee also you had to write a note on n&o sheet of the case file after anyone approached you. This was the practice everywhere. The DCBI seems to have drifted afar.


  3. You are very right in saying that without external audit the rot is bound to set in. In order to rejuvenate and reinforce our public accontability,whistle blowing and external monitors would prove to be very powerful elements. Shri J S Pandey’s suggestion is all welcome.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s